Skip to main content

Tackling MNIST Dataset : Deep Convolutional Neural Network 99.571% accurate

Hey there! My dear readers. 

Today this kernel review is going to be about the famous MNIST data-set, one of the most famous introductory datasets which we encounter along side Iris dataset and the titanic survival challenge data sets. 

Since it is a competition kernel, I have decided not to make it public. (yet)


Also,  if you want to try your hands at the challenge itself, then you can find the challenge page here : 





Note: This kernel has been largely focused on network modelling rather than Exploratory Data Analysis because it's simple, classic stuff. Still, I will try my best to explain that stuff here.


Exploratory Data Analysis


First indication of a great dataset is the face that it gives all the mentioned labels equal rows in it and this one doesn't disappoint.

This data set maintains a fair 4000+ entries per label which actually is a great statistic for a good dataset.



And the next thing one needs to know is how does that data look like?
For that, matplotlib's module comes handy. Essentially, in the dataset, each row describes pixel density in 1s and 0s,  which can be represented like this : 



Feature Engineering

Using the following processes, the dataset is perfectly pre processed. Mainly it converts the label data types into int32 and reshapes the training and testing numpy arrays into (number_of_examples, x_dimension, y_dimension, 1) . You must be thinking why 1? Well, we are dealing with black and white images. So 1 channel is sufficient, in case of colored images, you may want to use 3 channels.

To follow my steps, you can have fun using this code snippet:


Model Design

Here comes the fun part. I have modeled my own CNN in this way. Implementing Batch normalization, Dropouts and combined the classical CNN and Rectilinear Units in the end to try and maximize the accuracy. You can use this model here:  





I would like to extend the inspiration for the Tier 1 to Yug Khanna's model.
The model comes out to have the following architecture:

Model Training

The model architecture is fairly complex in itself, but there is one more technique i have used to complement the architectures training process. Namely Data Augmentation , using ImageDataGenerator, we achieve the same. The following code can be used to achieve the same.



The accuracy curve

Result

The resulting prediction hits the lovely accuracy score of 0.99571 which fetches you a rank in top 14% of the leader board! Hope you enjoyed this kernel!
I will soon release the kernel in public. Till then, enjoy your day!

Uddeshya Singh 

Comments

Total Pageviews

Popular posts from this blog

Kaggle Dataset Analysis : Is your Avocado organic or not?

Hey readers! Today, allow me to present you yet another dataset analysis of a rather gluttony topic, namely Avocado price analysis. This Data set  represents the historical data on avocado prices and sales volume in multiple US markets. Our prime objectives will be to visualize the dataset, pre-process it and ultimately test multiple sklearn classifiers to checkout which one gives us the best confidence and accuracy for our Avocado's Organic assurance! Note : I'd like to extend the kernel contribution to Shivam Negi . All this code belongs to him. Data Visualization This script must procure the following jointplot  While a similar joint plot can be drawn for conluding the linearly exponent relations between extra large bags and the small ones. Pre Processing The following script has been used for pre processing the input data. Model Definition and Comparisons We will be looking mostly at three different models, namely ra...

Artificial Intelligence Pens Shakespeare Sonnet!

Hey guys! I recently came across one excellent poetry algorithm named Deep-Speare.  It was developed by   A four-person team from the School of Information and the Graduate School of Education designed a computer algorithm   which was able to successfully fool people  trying to distinguish between human- and bot-written verses nearly 50 per cent of the time.  However, experts could still easily identify machine-generated poetry, and AI may have a long way to go before it can outdo Shakespeare, researchers said.  Computer scientists at University of Melbourne in Australia and University of Toronto in Canada designed an algorithm that writes poetry following the rules of rhyme and metre.  In some ways, the computer's verses were better than Shakespeare's. The rhymes and metre in the machine-generated poetry were more precise than in human-written poems. Test Run Feedback  The following excerpt is courtesy Economic Times: ...